stephenLweiss via Twitter 08:55 PM 05/23/13 reply | re-tweet
@lhhalstead @petenajarian @cnbcfastmoney @ReformedBroker why would I care about split? I own $C (Msgs, Twts) now not then. Financial returns better now
VictorRico3 via Twitter 06:50 PM 05/23/13 reply | re-tweet
RT @StarChaseGang: Stay true. We $C (Msgs, Twts), and we take this shit to heart.
LongShortTrader via Twitter 06:13 PM 05/23/13 reply | re-tweet
"@Nonrelatedsense: All time highs, 52 week highs, same thing. $C (Msgs, Twts) $HPQ (Msgs, Twts)" lol, truth and facts be damned.
SupFreshItsHrTn via Twitter 05:45 PM 05/23/13 reply | re-tweet
@RiskReversal funny how that one trader was saying not to be emotion, yet buying $C (Msgs, Twts) and practically getting emotional as possible lol
jjfische via Twitter 05:45 PM 05/23/13 reply | re-tweet
@cnbcfastmoney @stephenLweiss #bull... I bet Mr. Datatech would have be bearish on $C (Msgs, Twts) also #unhedged
AmarithLim via Twitter 05:38 PM 05/23/13 reply | re-tweet
@cnbcfastmoney #Bear Downtown is correct $C (Msgs, Twts) can't be bought at this level!
wrbva via Twitter 05:35 PM 05/23/13 reply | re-tweet
@cnbcfastmoney #BEAR for $C (Msgs, Twts) per @ReformedBroker
cnbcfastmoney via Twitter 05:34 PM 05/23/13 reply | re-tweet
$C (Msgs, Twts) Street Fight: @stephenLweiss (Bull: Rising Rates) vs. @ReformedBroker (Bear: Stretched at these Levels). Who won? Reply #Bull or #Bear
071625348 via Twitter 04:11 PM 05/23/13 reply | re-tweet
+1 : @karencoyle : "It may not make sense to try to convert things like 245 $C (Msgs, Twts) (rest of title) into linked data" http://t.co/Ndhak7KKjL












